- Home
- How We Score
How a Boosting Site Earns Its Score on bestboosters.net
Every score on this site starts with a receipt. I buy the order myself, at the public price, on an account I control, and the rating comes out of what happens next. That base stands at 336 paid test orders. The whole set gets re-checked every month, and the last pass closed July 9, 2026, so ratings move when the evidence moves. No shop pays a cent to appear here.
How We Build the Score
Five weighted inputs feed a Trust Score, and the result lands somewhere on a 0 to 100 scale. Every service page gets that same arithmetic, so a shop I happen to like never picks up a softened formula. Account protection carries the heaviest weight at 35% for a blunt reason: a fast climb is worthless if the login it was played on gets flagged a month later. Completion and speed take 25%, because a quoted start time means nothing until the job actually lands. The remaining 40% splits across pricing honesty, buyer evidence I could verify, and how support behaves when something goes sideways.
| Criterion | Weight | What it covers |
|---|---|---|
| Account protection | 35% | Whether the session stays hidden from your friends list, whether the booster plays through a connection anchored to your own country instead of routing in from wherever he happens to live, how your login is stored, and who inside the shop can pull it up. I also weigh how honestly a site states the suspension risk, plus what happens to active sessions and access once the job closes. |
| Completion reliability & speed | 25% | Did the paid job finish, did it begin when the shop said it would, and did it land inside the window quoted at checkout. I log every pause, every silent handover to a second booster, and any gap between what I ordered and what sat on the account when it came back to me. |
| Price honesty | 15% | The figure on the payment screen against the figure in the advert, checked across a sweep of rank gaps and regions so one lucky quote cannot carry the score. Service charges, currency spreads and priority upcharges that surface only at the last step cost points here, and so does a refund policy that lives nowhere except a live-chat promise. |
| Buyer feedback we could verify | 15% | Reviews I can tie to a real purchase, weighted far above raw star counts. I hunt for astroturf tells: clusters posted in a single week, repeated phrasing, accounts with one review to their name. Then I read how the shop answers its angriest customers. A hundred glowing lines tell me less than the shape of the complaints and what happened after them. |
| Support when it matters | 10% | Reply time and, more importantly, whether the reply solves anything. Each shop gets a plain question and one deliberately uncomfortable one - a mid-order change of plan, a request for the refund rule in writing, something no script covers - and the distance between those two answers says more than any published response target. |
What Gets Verified
- Reading the checkout. I walk the full order flow at least twice per shop, configurator through payment screen, and mark every point where the number moves. Sweeping several rank gaps catches the charges that appear only on longer jobs. Anything stacked on top of the advertised total gets written down with the amount and the step it showed up at.
- Orders I pay for. All 336 jobs came out of the site budget at public prices, with no reviewer discount and no warning to the shop. I timestamp the payment, the first message from a booster, each status change, and the condition of the account at handback. Nobody can stage a clean run for me if nobody knows which buyer I am.
- The awkward ticket. Once a job is underway, support gets a message they would rather not open: a scope change halfway through, a question about what happens if progress stalls for a week, a demand for the refund rule in written form. Speed counts for less here than whether a human read the thing and gave a straight answer.
- After the handback. When the job closes I pull active sessions, sign out anything I do not recognize, rotate the credentials, and watch that account for the rest of the month for penalties, warnings or leftover access. Trouble that surfaces days later still lands in the score, and that tail is where several shops give points back.
The Four Tiers
I cut the 0-100 range at three points: 90 and up earns an Excellent, 75 to 89 lands as Good, 60 to 74 as Fair, and anything below 60 finishes Poor.
How We Stay Independent
Placement on this page carries no price tag. Every job on the ledger was paid for out of our own budget, and four rules hold that line:
- Affiliate links cover hosting. They touch neither the order of a ranking nor a single point of a Trust Score, because the math runs before anyone looks at who monetizes.
- A shop reads its rating when you do. There is no preview, no advance right of reply, no quiet window to talk a number upward.
- Positions on the list are not for sale. A service cannot buy its way up the page, and it cannot buy the removal of something we found while spending our own money on its product.
- Confirmed mistakes get corrected in the open, dated, with the old claim named. Quiet edits would drag down the value of every other figure here.
Who Is Behind the Scores
Chris Vaughn, Head of Testing at Best Boosters. Three years on the support desk of a League boosting shop taught me how a genuine delay sounds next to a rehearsed excuse, which turns out to be most of this job now that I sit on the other side of the ticket. I place and pay for the 336 orders behind these ratings, keep the logs, and run the monthly re-audit that last closed July 9, 2026.
Fixing Errors
I would rather be corrected than quoted wrong. If a claim about your service is stale or flatly incorrect, send the page link and the disputed line to info@bestboosters.net. Every number on this site traces back to a logged order, so we pull the record for that run, hold it against what you sent, and publish the fix when the log backs you.